Pentagon hushes up data on Taliban in Afghan war
A US government watchdog said on 30 January the US Department of Defense (DoD) has barred it from disclosing how much of Afghanistan is under Taliban control – a significant break from past accountability that comes amid mounting security woes.
At issue are the number of Afghan districts, and the populations living in them, considered to be held or influenced by the Kabul government by insurgents or contested by both.
The US government has sometimes referred to such numbers in the 16-year-old war to show how the Afghan security forces are faring against a resurgent Taliban.
But in a report published on 30 January, the US government’s office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) said the DoD had instructed it to no longer disclose the numbers.
John Sopko, special inspector general for Afghanistan Reconstruction, in SIGAR’s latest quarterly report, wrote: ‘This development is troubling for a number of reasons, not least of which is that this is the first time SIGAR has been specifically instructed not to release information marked “unclassified” to the American taxpayer.’
The move comes months after Washington in 2017 agreed to an Afghan request to classify data on the number of Afghan security forces killed or wounded in the conflict.
SIGAR said the DoD had also asked its office, for the first time since 2009, to classify the figures detailing the size and attrition rates of Afghan security forces.
The DoD did not dispute that the data had been restricted, but denied it was the agency that had told SIGAR not to publish them, instead pointing to the US-led NATO mission in Afghanistan.
Lieutenant Colonel Mike Andrews, a spokesman from the US DoD, said: ‘In this case, NATO’s Resolute Support, as the original classification authority, made a classification determination that restricted the public, unclassified release of the information.’
General John Nicholson, who commands US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, has said 80% of the Afghan population can be under government control within about two years, up from less than two thirds today.
But tracking progress toward such a goal would be difficult without any numbers being released.
Sopko said: ‘Historically, the number of districts controlled or influenced by the government has been falling since SIGAR began reporting on it, while the number controlled or influenced by the insurgents has been rising.’
He added that this ‘fact that should cause even more concern about its disappearance from public disclosure and discussion’.
Militants including the Taliban and the Islamic State group have stepped up their attacks on Afghan troops and police in recent months.
On 27 January, a Taliban suicide attacker driving an explosives-packed ambulance blew it up in a crowded area of the capital, killing at least 103 people – mainly civilians – and wounding 235 in one of the worst bombings in the city in recent years.
More from Defence Notes
-
Eurosatory 2026: New public security needs drive personal protection equipment modernisation
European law enforcement and public security agencies are entering a new cycle of investment in personal protection equipment (PPE), driven by evolving threat profiles, officer welfare requirements and advances in materials technology.
-
Eurosatory 2026: Milrem Robotics puts forward multi-layered defence concept for NATO’s eastern flank
Autonomous systems developer Milrem has evolved a model for an interoperable robotised approach to the Eastern Flank Deterrence Initiative (EFDI), showing how uncrewed systems could provide a multi-layered defence architecture in the air and on land along NATO’s eastern borders.
-
Eurosatory 2026 to highlight changing defence and security priorities
Eurosatory 2026 will reflect a defence and security sector shaped by conflict, rising government spending, uncrewed systems, multidomain networks and growing demand for sovereign capabilities.
-
Delays, departures and drama cloud UK defence programmes ahead of absent DIP
The UK defence secretary’s departure suggests that the long-delayed Defence Investment Plan is unlikely to meet the funding demands of the armed forces, with consequences for procurement and the UK’s standing at a NATO summit weeks away.