PAS 2011: VSI presses for U-turn on JSF alternate helmet
A requirement to replace the troubled Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) helmet mounted display system (HMDS) with an interim solution could be axed, according to manufacturer Vision Systems International (VSI).
Speaking to Shephard at the Paris Air Show, VSI president Andrés Brugal said a 'Helmet Improvement Plan' would be proposed to JSF prime contractor Lockheed Martin this week which could reverse the US Department of Defense's decision downselect an alternate legacy HMDS.
In March, Lockheed Martin published a Request for Proposals (RfP) for an alternate HMDS with BAE Systems and Gentex understood to have responded. Sources told Shephard that a decision was due to have been made within the next ten days but according to Brugal, this has now been pushed back to August.
'Our Helmet Improvement Plan was presented to Lockheed Martin and they accepted it and we will be proposing it this week,' he said. 'Lockheed Martin is reviewing the RfP for an alternate system, but we have provided positive enough results [in the improvement plan] to show a path that might make an alternate unnecessary.
'The government still needs to be confident that their requirements are met,' Brugal explained while outlining requirements to have a HMDS ready to go live with the US Marine Corps' initial operating capability in the Fall of 2013. 'We need a schedule that supports that,' he urged.
The JSF HMDS problems stem from difficulties encountered integrating the aircraft's Distributed Aperture System (DAS) night vision capability onto the pilot's visor. This has lacked sufficient acuity when compared to in-service analogue night vision devices, sources said. However, Brugal stressed that VSI had seen 'compelling results' regarding development of the Helmet Improvement Plan.
'Latency related to image core processing and resolution of DAS sensors didn't satisfy the pilot's needs,' he described while discussing how VSI would now use a helmet-mounted camera as the primary sensor for night vision operation. However, the DAS will remain the primary sensor for daylight operation.
Comprising improvements to the Electrically Bombarded Advanced Pixelated System (EBAPS) sensor, VSI's solution includes the upgrade of the Interval Sensor Image Emitter (ISIE) 10 to ISIE 11. Also, Brugal described how a 'jitter' problem with the HMDS would also be rectified by software upgrades and the integration of an inertial motion unit.
To reinforce his confidence in the system, Brugal explained that VSI had been asked to propose an alternate solution of its own although the company refused to do such a thing due to its confidence that it could meet requirements with the existing HMDS.
More from Defence Notes
-
UK releases security strategy and plans for future defence spending boost
The UK’s National Security Strategy brings together the recently released Strategic Defence Review (SDR), Strategic Security Review, AUKUS Review and Industrial and Trade Strategies. At the same time, the UK made a commitment to reach defence spending of 5% of GDP by 2035 and Germany committed to 3.5% by 2029.
-
Pentagon’s FY26 defence budget proposal is $130 billion more than US Congress plans to provide
The House Committee on Appropriations approved a FY2026 bill reducing investments in main defence programmes.
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.