Not seeking Cold War with Russia, says NATO chief
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on 16 March that the alliance did not want a return to Cold War hostilities with Russia while expressing support for Britain's strong stance on the nerve agent attack.
He said the targeting of former double agent Sergei Skripal fit a ‘pattern of reckless behaviour’ to which the US-led military alliance had responded, but insisted political dialogue must also continue.
Stoltenberg told BBC radio: ‘We do not want a new Cold War, we do not want a new arms race, Russia is our neighbour therefore we have to continue to strive for an improved better relationship with Russia.’
He noted that NATO allies have in recent years imposed economic sanctions on Russia and deployed more troops in eastern Europe in response to the ‘changed security situation’.
But he stressed: ‘To isolate Russia is not an alternative.’
He added: ‘At some point Russia will understand that it is in its interests not to confront us but to cooperate with us, and we are ready to do so if they respect some basic norms and rules for international behaviour.’
NATO has backed Britain following the 4 March attack in the southwestern English city of Salisbury, which left Skripal and his daughter Yulia in a critical condition.
Stoltenberg said: ‘We have no reason to doubt the findings and assessments made by the British government, not least because this takes place at the backdrop of a pattern of reckless behaviour by Russia over many years.’
British Foreign Minister Boris Johnson on 16 March stressed the government's ‘quarrel’ was with Russian President Vladimir Putin rather than the Russian people.
Johnson, during a museum visit in west London alongside his Polish counterpart Jacek Czaputowicz, said: ‘Our quarrel is with Putin's Kremlin, and with his decision, and we think it overwhelmingly likely that it was his decision to direct the use of a nerve agent on the streets of the UK, on the streets of Europe, for the first time since the Second World War. That is why we are at odds with Russia.’
Opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn, who has questioned whether the Russian state was responsible for the attack, warned on 16 March against a ‘drift to conflict’.
Writing in The Guardian, the Labour leader said ‘a connection to Russian mafia-like groups that have been allowed to gain a toehold in Britain cannot be excluded.’
He said: ‘To rush way ahead of the evidence being gathered by the police, in a fevered parliamentary atmosphere, serves neither justice nor our national security.’
Corbyn's leftwing views have in the past drawn criticism of many of his own MPs, and several among them have defied him to back the Conservative government's position.
By 16 March morning, 33 Labour MPs had signed a parliamentary motion blaming the Russian state ‘unequivocally’.
Corbyn wrote that Labour was ‘no supporter of the Putin regime’, but added: ‘That does not mean we should resign ourselves to a 'new Cold War' of escalating arms spending, proxy conflicts across the globe and a McCarthyite intolerance of dissent.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.