No fast-track NATO membership for Georgia
German Chancellor Angela Merkel on 24 August ruled out any fast-track NATO membership for Georgia, ten years after the alliance's leaders pledged the ex-Soviet nation would join the club.
During a meeting with students at the Tbilisi State University in the Georgian capital, Merkel said: ‘I do not see Georgia's prompt accession to NATO (membership), this is the position of Germany.’
‘Things come gradually,’ she said of the country's NATO integration during the first leg of her regional trip to the South Caucasus.
At a summit in Bucharest in 2008, NATO leaders said Georgia would become a NATO member at some point, but – under pressure from Merkel and France's then-president Nicolas Sarkozy – refused to put the tiny Black Sea nation on a formal membership path.
Georgia's bid to join the 29-nation military alliance has infuriated its Soviet-era master Russia.
Years of increasing tensions culminated in August 2008 with a brief war over Georgia's Moscow-backed separatist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
The war – which saw Russian troops routing Georgia's small military in just five days – claimed the lives of hundreds of people from both sides.
After the conflict, Russia recognised the two enclaves as independent states and stationed permanent military bases there.
The move constitutes ‘an occupation of 20% of Georgia's territory and a great injustice,’ Merkel told students.
In a symbolic move, Merkel on 24 August also went to the administrative boundary with South Ossetia, where Russian border guards have set up barbed wire fences.
On 24 August evening, she will travel to Armenia and on to Azerbaijan, where she will encourage ‘a peaceful and consensual solution’ to the two countries' long-running territorial conflict over the Nagorny Karabakh region, her office has said.
In Azerbaijan she is expected to discuss energy cooperation with the oil-rich Caspian nation, which is seen as one option for reducing Europe's reliance on Russian natural gas and oil.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.