France questions if US support for NATO is 'perennial'
France's defence minister questioned on 18 March 2019 whether the US commitment to the NATO alliance is ‘perennial’ and said Europe needs to build defence ‘autonomy’ as that question goes unanswered.
With Washington increasingly focused on the strategic challenge from China, Florence Parly said, ‘a question mark has emerged’ over the transatlantic alliance. Those posing the question would not be reassured, she said, ‘by the current atmosphere of withdrawal: withdrawal from battlefields, from treaties, from trade pacts.’
‘What Europeans are worried about is this: will the US commitment (to NATO) be perennial? Should we assume that it will go on as was the case in the past 70 years?’ Parly asked the Atlantic Council in Washington ahead of a meeting with Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan.
The minister said she was most concerned about President Donald Trump apparently tying the US commitment and Europe's readiness to spend more on defence, including buying more US defence equipment. ‘The alliance should be unconditional, otherwise it is not an alliance. NATO's solidarity clause is called Article V, not article F-35,’ she said, referring to the US fighter jet.
Parly conceded Trump's criticism that NATO's European members need to spend more on shared defense, but she said it would be good to build up a measure of autonomy so as not to overly depend on the US military. The Europeans ‘have started to look honestly at what they would be really able to do if left on their own,’ she said. ‘Building a European autonomy should never be seen as a move against the US. We want America solidly steeped in NATO. Autonomy should be a variation on friendship.’
‘Every time the US has retreated from Europe, threats have come back to haunt the US itself,’ she added.
Parly also gave support for the continued presence of US forces in Syria, and said France could take part - an issue she would be discussing with Shanahan. ‘Today, we are carefully studying the recent US offer to maintain a residual presence, in cooperation with a few partners,’ she said.
You may also like
More from Defence Notes
-
![Why small guns have been critical to layered CUAS architectures]()
Why small guns have been critical to layered CUAS architectures
Multiple countries have been deploying small arms as the last line of drone defence due to their multiple operational and tactical advantages.
-
![Singapore Airshow 2026: ST Engineering hints at export success for AME assault rifle family]()
Singapore Airshow 2026: ST Engineering hints at export success for AME assault rifle family
The Singapore-based technology company unveiled its new rifle family at this week’s airshow. Chen Chuanren spoke with the ST Engineering’s head of small arms to find out more about how the weapons have been refined.
-
![High tension in the High North – a wake-up call for NATO’s future Arctic defence efforts?]()
High tension in the High North – a wake-up call for NATO’s future Arctic defence efforts?
Any potential ‘Arctic Sentry’ mission would be months in the planning, but with tensions high in the region given the US’s push for Greenland, NATO countries will need to continue to emphasise their commitment to the region, analysts have said.
-
![Venezuela prepares personnel and equipment for a potential second US attack]()
Venezuela prepares personnel and equipment for a potential second US attack
Defence Minister Gen Vladimir Padrino López has declared that the Venezuelan armed forces “will continue to employ all its available capabilities for military defence”.
-
![As the new year starts, the UK defence spending delay continues]()
As the new year starts, the UK defence spending delay continues
The UK’s defence spending commitments remain uncertain as the government’s Defence Investment Plan, which had been due by the end of 2025, is yet to be published.
-
![How might European countries look to tackle drone incursions?]()
How might European countries look to tackle drone incursions?
Disruption of infrastructure in Europe, whether by cyberattack, physical damage to pipelines or uncrewed aerial vehicles flying over major airports, as has happened more recently, is on the rise. What is the most effective way of countering the aerial aspect of this not-so-open warfare?
