Beijing’s South China Sea bombers fly in face of protests
China’s brazen landing of nuclear-capable bombers on anisland in the disputed South China Sea is a bold power play to bolster its territorial claims while rivals are divided and the US distracted by North Korea, analysts say.
China attracted diplomatic protests after long-range H-6K bombers carried out landing and takeoff drills at an unidentified island airstrip on 18 May.
But Beijing has long brushed aside such condemnation, denying that it was militarising the region even though it has installed an array of airstrips, radar systems and naval facilities on a string of islands it has reclaimed in contested areas since 2013.
The planes are believed to have landed on Woody Island, China’s largest base in the Paracel Islands which is also claimed by Vietnam and Taiwan, according to Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington.
An H-6K long-range strategic bomber deployed to Woody Island could reach almost the entire South China Sea and many countries surrounding it, according to a CSIS analysis.
The steady buildup of military assets in the waterway – believed to have significant oil and natural gas deposits – allows China to ‘influence its weaker neighbours in peacetime,’ Glaser said.
Glaser added: ‘Through the use of a large number of law enforcement ships, for example, it can pressure Vietnam and the Philippines not to unilaterally extract energy in waters that China claims jurisdictional rights.
‘In wartime, China’s military assets on these islands will increase the risk to the US of intervening militarily.’
Earlier in May 2018 China deployed anti-ship cruise missiles and surface-to-air missiles on the disputed Spratly Islands off the Philippine coast, CNBC reported, citing sources close to US intelligence.
Beijing claims virtually all the South China Sea and has ignored partial counter-claims from the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Brunei and Malaysia.
The Pentagon condemned bomber drills on 18 May as a sign of ‘continued militarisation’ of disputed islands while Vietnam said the move violated its sovereignty and raised tensions in the region.
The Philippines, which has largely backed off from the sea dispute under China-friendly President Rodrigo Duterte, said it was taking ‘appropriate diplomatic action.’
Despite the rhetoric, experts say little has been done to prevent China from solidifying its vast maritime claims.
Beijing has managed to weaken regional resistance by courting some members of the 10-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
While US warships have conducted ‘freedom of navigation’ operations near Chinese-claimed features, they have not deterred Beijing.
The bombers were deployed while US President Donald Trump is focused on preparing for a summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in June 2018.
Euan Graham, director of the international security programme at the Australian think tank the Lowy Institute, said: ‘I think there is an obvious political motivation for the timing. Because the US is mainly engaged in the North Korea files... there is a window of opportunity where the US reaction is likely to be restrained.’
China’s foreign ministry has repeated denials that the region was being militarised, saying the islands belong to Beijing and the bombers were conducting ‘normal training’.
The latest exercises were ‘largely symbolic’ and not a significant military development, Graham said.
To deploy from Woody Island, China would have to install logistics infrastructure to operate aircraft, refuel them, store weapons and house crews, he said.
Graham said: ‘Just landing an aircraft doesn’t make it an operational space.’
It would be more significant if and when China starts flying combat aircraft to the Spratlys, he said, because that would bring northern Australia into missile range.
Nearly a third of global trade passes through the South China Sea and Beijing has bigger commercial and military ambitions for this strategic sea area, said William Choong, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in Singapore.
China could create an air defence identification zone to spot incursions into its claimed sovereign airspace, something it did in the East China Sea in 2013 amid a dispute over the Senkaku islands with Japan, Choong said.
Beijing could also establish a base for nuclear submarines as the deep waters around the Spratlys ‘provide a good hiding place,’ he said.
Despite the looming threat, the international community – including India, Japan, the US and Australia –has failed to achieve a united front against China’s island-building spree, Choong said.
Choong added: ‘Apart from the freedom of navigation missions and the strong rhetoric, the US hasn’t been able to corral together a coalition of the willing, to effectively to get China to stop the militarisation of the South China Sea.’
More from Defence Notes
-
Canada’s new military drone marketplace targets rapid acquisition pipeline
The Department of National Defence expects initial contracts to deliver thousands of uncrewed systems, but has yet to establish the quantities, capability mix or deadline behind Ottawa’s promised tenfold expansion.
-
Ukraine turns legacy Kongsberg land turrets into semi-autonomous USV weapons
The company told Shephard that Ukraine is operating modified Protector weapon stations originally supplied for armoured vehicles, with human operators authorising engagements from hundreds of kilometres away.
-
UK urged to prioritise sea, air and space over heavy armour
A report from the Council on Geostrategy argues the UK should move away from a traditional balanced force and shift investment to naval, air and space capabilities, backed by a larger fleet of attack submarines and deeper AUKUS integration.
-
Thales: deployment speed to determine winners in ‘production versus production’ era
At its technology summit in London, attended by Shephard, Thales UK examined the importance of speed to delivery, the growing focus on cross-domain capabilities and how procurement reform could be crucial for future battlefield advantage.
-
Orchestrating operational readiness across every defence domain
Are all systems ready for the next mission? Have upgrades been applied? Are all assets aligned to deploy together, on time and fully prepared? In modern defence operations, readiness is no longer measured platform by platform. It is measured by how well people, assets, data and decisions move together — across land, sea and air.
-
Global tensions drive defence supply chain scrutiny
Governments worldwide are scrambling to decouple defence supply chains from dependency upon strategic rivals, but countries could struggle to do it all themselves.