Airbus to pay $99 million fine in Eurofighter case
Airbus has agreed to pay a fine of $99 million to settle a corruption probe into the 2003 sale of Eurofighter jets to Austria, German prosecutors said on 9 February.
The investigation did not find evidence of bribery to secure the lucrative contract, the Munich prosecutors said in a statement.
However, they said Airbus had failed in its supervisory duty by allowing former management to make multi-million-dollar payments linked to the deal for ‘unclear purposes’.
The European aircraft manufacturer said in its own statement it had accepted the fine, meaning that the probe first opened in 2012 ‘has been terminated’.
Authorities in Austria however are still investigating claims bribers were paid to land the $2.45 billion sale of 18 Eurofighter jets to Vienna, a deal long alleged to have been very shady.
In 2017, the Austrian government also launched a lawsuit against Airbus, seeking up $1.35 billion in damages. It accuses the aircraft giant of deliberately hoodwinking Vienna over the order.
Current Airbus CEO, Tom Enders, was head of the defence division of European Aeronautic Defence Space Company at the time the deal was struck.
The corruption probes in Germany and Austria, as well separate graft investigations in the UK and France, have long cast a pall over one of Europe's most successful and best known companies.
Airbus announced in December 2017 that Enders would not seek reappointment when his current term ends in April 2019.
More from Defence Notes
-
![What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow]()
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
![Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme]()
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
![Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans]()
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
![UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions]()
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
![Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details]()
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.
