What lessons could Europe learn from air power use in Ukraine?
The use of small drones has opened up new possibilities for cost-effective strike but such systems have range and payload limitations. (Photo: Ukraine MoD)
It’s fair to say that June’s remote first-person view (FPV) drone strike on four Russian airfields was totally unexpected. The targeting of bombers that had been a key part of standoff actions against Ukrainian cities was surprising in just about every regard.
The long-term planning to load heavy trucks with uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) and position these thousands of kilometres inside Russia, astonished everyone. The intelligence work to ensure the targets were there would have been a major achievement. Moreover, the mission required multi-mode control systems, involving relatively un-jammable fibre-optic cable, radio and some autonomy so that the probability of
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Air Warfare
-
Franco-German alliance aims to resolve FCAS woes by end of April as dispute rolls on
The disagreement between French-German industry continues as both governments work to keep the programme alive and on track to develop and deliver a sixth-generation fighter jet.
-
US Air Force is eyeing cost-effective automated counter-drone solutions
The USAF is seeking on-the-move systems, subsystems or technologies capable of defending airbases and fixed and semi-fixed sites against small drone attacks.
-
Long-range drone acquisition axed as Norway announces $11.75 billion spending uplift
Norway’s funding boost will help the country reach 3.5% of GDP on defence spending by 2035, with autonomous systems part of the long list of priorities alongside frigate acquisition and development of a new Finnmark Brigade.