US Air Force divestment plans could create capability gaps in the Air National Guard
Two A-10 jets fly a training mission over Maryland. (Photo: US Air National Guard)
The retirement of A-10s would reduce the guard fleet and its squadron structure making it more difficult for the service to accomplish its tasks worldwide.
US Air Force (USAF) divestment plans could deeply impact the Air National Guard and generate capabilities gaps in its inventory, as well as affect its fighter fleet, reduce its squadron structure and hamper its capacity to execute global operations, according to testimony delivered last week before the US Senate Committee on Appropriations.
Leaders of the guard raised the alarm on the risky position the service would be placed in should the plans be executed, with Gen Daniel R. Hokanson, chief of the National Guard Bureau, warning that the US must ensure the branch’s combat and response capabilities reflect the challenges of the future.
Our news & analysis is now part of Defence Insight®
A Basic-level or higher Defence Insight subscription is now required to view this content.
More from Air Warfare
-
![Pentagon’s 800% PAC-3 MSE surge faces production bottleneck as Patriot demand soars]()
Pentagon’s 800% PAC-3 MSE surge faces production bottleneck as Patriot demand soars
The Pentagon wants to procure 3,203 PAC-3 MSE interceptors in FY2027, but production constraints and international demand could impact efforts to rebuild depleted missile stocks.
-
![AIM-260 JATM deal puts Australia’s missile-industrial ambitions in focus]()
AIM-260 JATM deal puts Australia’s missile-industrial ambitions in focus
While a potentially accelerated acquisition timeline could strengthen the RAAF’s long-range air combat capability, Canberra’s continued reliance on US missile production is also put under the spotlight in parallel to its push to build a sovereign industry.
-
![Attack drones versus CUAS – the future of warfare or just another trend?]()
Attack drones versus CUAS – the future of warfare or just another trend?
Demand signals for counter-drone technology are strong and the market is becoming crowded, but is this really the beginning of a new phase of warfare or will commentators be talking about something else 10 years from now?
