Create a free starter account, or log in.

Get access to four free articles per month, as well as our Decisive Edge Newsletters and Daily News Bulletin.

Email Address

Password

Forgot your password? Reset by clicking here

Create a Password

[[ req.met ? '✓' : '•' ]] [[ req.text ]]

Re-enter Password

Passwords do not match

First Name

Last Name

Country

Confirm your account

Please enter the four-digit pin below that has been emailed to you.

Didn't receive the pin yet?

This pin expires in 20 minutes.

[[ error ]]

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Stay informed with Shephard's award-winning journalism. Unlock unlimited access and in-depth analysis with a corporate or individual subscription.

Explore your options here

Technology transfer: how well does it work?

21st April 2025 - 15:29 GMT | by Christopher F Foss in London

RSS

Otokar's Cobra II 4x4 will soon be built in Romania under a contract signed late last year. (Photo: Otokar)

Technology transfer is trumpeted by many companies as a way to tap into new markets, win contracts and expand supply and manufacturing capability. It is often used in the area of armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) and these requirements are a way to see how – and if – they work.

The ‘grip and grin’ photo opportunity with cooperation agreements on the table is a staple at defence shows as large companies look for a way into smaller markets or countries with large requirements looking to grow their own industrial base.

While many sales of new AFVs still involve old-school off-the-shelf purchases, many countries also require the technology transfer element.

When it comes to AFVs, systems which might be ‘transferred’ include the complete suspension and drive line, engine, transmission, transfer box and key larger elements such as complete turrets and weapon systems.

Additionally, there is the ammunition for those weapons. While

Already have an account? Log in