US defends false missile alert
On 14 January, a top US official defended government early-warning systems after a false missile alert terrified Hawaii, in what was called an epic failure that emphasised the need for talks with North Korea.
The Pacific archipelago was already on edge over fears of a North Korean attack when the phones of residents and tourists blared the alert just after 8:00 am (1800 GMT) on 13 January.
The US emergency management officials later admitted ‘the wrong button was pushed’ during a shift change. It took the officials nearly 40 minutes to issue a corrected message.
David Ige, Governor of Hawaii, said there was no automatic way to cancel the false alarm, meaning it had to be done manually.
Ballistic missile defence capabilities, such as the Patriot system (pictured), are known to be in high demand worldwide.
Tulsi Gabbard, US Representative of Hawaii, issued her own advisory of the false alarm much earlier after directly checking with civil defence officials.
Gabbard said: ‘It’s an epic failure of leadership. It was unacceptable that this went out in the first place, but the fact that it took so long for them to put out that second message, to calm people, to allay their fears that this was a mistake, a false alarm is something that has to be fixed, corrected with people held accountable.’
The alert, which read ‘ballistic missile threat inbound to Hawaii. Seek immediate shelter. This is not a drill,” sent people rushing for safety, whether in a bathtub, a basement, a manhole or cowering under mattresses.
Ajit Pai, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, said: ‘False alerts undermine public confidence in the alerting system and thus reduce their effectiveness during real emergencies.
‘It appears that the government of Hawaii did not have reasonable safeguards or process controls in place to prevent the transmission of a false alert.’
The message came after months of soaring tensions between Washington and Pyongyang, which claimed it had successfully tested ballistic missiles that could deliver atomic warheads to the US, including the Hawaiian island popular with tourists.
Kirstjen Nielsen, US Secretary for Homeland Security, ‘urged people not to draw the wrong conclusion’ from the Hawaii incident.
Nielsen said: ‘I would hate for anybody not to abide by alert warnings coming from government systems. They can trust government systems, we test them every day. This was a very unfortunate mistake, but these alerts are vital; seconds and minutes can save lives.’
Nielsen continued that her department is working with state and local authorities ‘to make sure it does not happen again.’
Vern Miyagi, administrator of Hawaii’s Emergency Management Agency, has acknowledged that ‘we made a mistake’ for which he apologised.
Miyagi said that a rule has already been put in place ordering that two people be present before the button is pushed to issue an alert. A cancellation message ‘template’ will also be created to avoid a delay.
Ige said: ‘What happened today was totally unacceptable.’
According to Gabbard, the false alarm highlighted a broader issue and the risk of accidental nuclear war.
Gabbard said: ‘We have got to get to the underlying issue here of, why are the people of Hawaii and this country facing a nuclear threat coming from North Korea today? And what is this President doing urgently to eliminate that threat?’
‘I have been calling on President Trump to directly negotiate with North Korea.’
Donald Trump, President of US, said that he would be willing to speak directly with North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un, with whom he has traded sharp words over Pyongyang’s missile and nuclear tests.
More from Defence Notes
-
UK urged to prioritise sea, air and space over heavy armour
A report from the Council on Geostrategy argues the UK should move away from a traditional balanced force and shift investment to naval, air and space capabilities, backed by a larger fleet of attack submarines and deeper AUKUS integration.
-
Thales: deployment speed to determine winners in ‘production versus production’ era
At its technology summit in London, attended by Shephard, Thales UK examined the importance of speed to delivery, the growing focus on cross-domain capabilities and how procurement reform could be crucial for future battlefield advantage.
-
Orchestrating operational readiness across every defence domain
Are all systems ready for the next mission? Have upgrades been applied? Are all assets aligned to deploy together, on time and fully prepared? In modern defence operations, readiness is no longer measured platform by platform. It is measured by how well people, assets, data and decisions move together — across land, sea and air.
-
Global tensions drive defence supply chain scrutiny
Governments worldwide are scrambling to decouple defence supply chains from dependency upon strategic rivals, but countries could struggle to do it all themselves.
-
How deepening AI usage can boost efficiency and maximise effects for forces
Saab has outlined how it is using artificial intelligence to make training more like electronic gaming, while the UK’s Power Size Technologies is applying the same technology to better evaluate and design vehicle capability, moving AI-enabled innovation further upstream from the frontline.
-
From systems integrator to multi-domain solutions provider (video)
Philipp von Brandenstein, Head of Corporate Communications at Rheinmetall, explains how Eurosatory 2026 marked a new stage in the company's evolution.