US concerns over EU defence pact cloud NATO meet
US concerns over the EU's landmark defence cooperation pact and increasingly strained relations between Washington and Turkey look set to loom large as NATO defence ministers meet for talks on 14 February.
The US and Ankara, two of the transatlantic alliance's most important members, are at loggerheads over Turkey's military offensive in northern Syria, which US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on 13 February warned was detracting from the fight against the Islamic State group.
The two-day meeting at NATO headquarters in Brussels is expected to approve changes to NATO's command structure aimed at making the alliance fit for the challenges of warfare in the 21st century, particularly cyber tactics and hybrid warfare, as fears grow about Russian assertiveness.
But a working dinner with EU diplomatic chief Federica Mogherini on 14 February night has taken on greater significance after senior US officials voiced fears about the bloc's defence pact and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg warned it must not undermine the alliance.
Stoltenberg said on 13 January that efforts to boost EU defence spending were welcome, but only if they were coordinated with NATO plans, warning there was ‘no way’ the EU could replace the transatlantic alliance in guaranteeing European security.
Stoltenberg continued: ‘It will be absolutely without any meaning if NATO and the EU start to compete. European allies are absolutely aware that the defence, the protection of Europe is dependent on NATO.’
The EU's so-called permanent structured cooperation on defence agreement, known as PESCO, has projects in view already to develop new military equipment and improve cooperation and decision-making.
But on 11 February a senior official working with US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis said Washington had concerns some of the proposed initiatives risked ‘pulling resources or capabilities away from NATO.’
And on 13 February US ambassador to NATO Kay Bailey Hutchison ramped up the pressure, warning the EU there could be serious consequences if it shuts US defence companies out of cooperation projects.
Hutchison said: ‘Certainly we do not want this to be a protectionist vehicle for the EU and we are going to watch carefully, because if that becomes the case then it could splinter the strong security alliance that we have.’
The US concerns have surprised some European diplomats, with one insisting that EU defence cooperation poses no threat to NATO, adding that ‘a little explanatory work’ is required to clarify matters with the Americans.
The dinner on 14 February now represents an important chance for Mogherini to reassure the US, which is NATO's biggest contributor.
Potentially more serious is the festering row between the US and Turkey over Ankara's ‘Operation Olive Branch’ launched in January against the Syrian Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG).
While Turkey views the YPG as a ‘terrorist’ group, the US has been working closely with the militia against Islamic State in Syria and giving it weapons, infuriating Ankara.
US ambassador Hutchison said Turkey remained an important ally and the two sides were trying to resolve the dispute.
Mattis is to meet his Turkish counterpart on the sidelines of the meeting on 14 February.
A diplomatic source said that while the row was ‘a topic of concern for NATO’, it was not a matter for the alliance to resolve.
The source said: ‘The issue will be solved bilaterally between the US and Turkey.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.