Trump ousts Veterans Affairs chief
US President Donald Trump shook up his cabinet once again on 28 March, sacking embattled Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin and nominating White House doctor Ronny Jackson as his successor.
Trump, who has also replaced his Secretary of State and National Security Adviser in February, said on Twitter: ‘I am pleased to announce that I intend to nominate highly respected Admiral Ronny L. Jackson, MD, as the new Secretary of Veterans Affairs. I am thankful for Dr. David Shulkin's service to our country and to our great veterans!'
Pentagon official Robert Wilkie would serve as Interim Department Chief until Jackson receives Congressional approval, the President added.
Shulkin's sacking had been widely predicted after he was accused of spending $122,000 on a nine-day trip to Europe with his wife, which included sightseeing at castles and taking in professional tennis matches.
He was one of the few senior officials in the Trump administration who had also served during the presidency of Barack Obama.
Jackson's stock with Trump rose after he pronounced in January that the 71-year-old President was in ‘excellent’ health.
After releasing the results from Trump's physical, Jackson said ‘he has incredible genes and that's the way God made him.’
VoteVets, a progressive organisation, urged Senators to ‘ask him blunt, direct questions about how the VA works’ during his confirmation hearing.
The group wrote on Twitter: ‘We are concerned about his readiness to assume control.’
AMVETS Executive Director Joe Chenelly questioned whether Jackson, who has no experience in management, is qualified to run a $200 billion a year bureaucracy, the second largest agency in the US government.
Chenelly asked in a statement: ‘With an official bio that does not seem to contain any indication that he's held a command, is the President's nominee fully prepared to lead such a massive bureaucracy?’
Shulkin's departure caps a dizzying month of changes to the Trump cabinet, most notably the sacking of Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State on 13 March.
Trump's top economic adviser Gary Cohn also exited the White House after the President announced plans to impose tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum, a policy Cohn did not endorse.
And national security adviser HR McMaster was axed only six days ago, replaced by the Fox News pundit and former UN ambassador John Bolton.
The Department of Veterans Affairs is the largest federal agency after the Pentagon, employing 360,000 people.
Lack of funding has weakened the hospital network specifically dedicated to the health of veterans – a key constituency for Trump.
And the system has come under criticism from many veterans and organisations for falling short, particularly in terms of psychiatric care.
Hundreds of thousands of veterans, many who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder.
The 58-year-old Shulkin had served as Undersecretary of Vterans Affairs for health under Obama.
He previously worked as chief medical officer of the University of Pennsylvania health system.
During his tenure as secretary, he oversaw legislative changes including an expansion of benefits for post-9/11 veterans.
Following Trump's announcement, Phil Roe, a Tennessee Republican who chairs the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, praised Shulkin for a ‘fantastic job,’ adding: ‘I hate to see him go.’
Roe further added: ‘That said, I respect President Trump's decision, support the President's agenda and remain willing to work with anyone committed to doing the right thing on behalf of our nation's veterans.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.