Swiss backtrack on weapon sales to conflict states
The Swiss government has reversed a decision to loosen restrictions on weapons exports to countries wracked by internal conflict, following outcry over the planned move.
Switzerland’s government, known as the Federal Council, said in a 31 October statement it had decided “not to amend the War Material Ordinance”.
That marked a reversal from its highly controversial decision in mid-June to allow weapons exports to countries in the throes of civil strife, as long as there was no reason to believe the arms would be used in the conflict.
The initial decision, which according to Swiss news agency ATS came amid heavy pressure from Swiss arms manufacturers, had been meant to “align the authorisation criteria in the War Material Ordinance with those of comparable European countries,” the government said, adding that it had been based on “security policy and economic considerations.”
If it had gone through, the reform would have marked a shift from the current Swiss ban on weapons’ exports to countries involved in internal or international conflicts.
The government had insisted in June that even if the restrictions were loosened, Swiss arms would not be sent to countries ravaged by widespread civil war like Yemen and Syria.
Despite those assurances, the reform plans sparked widespread outrage, and parliament refused to support the move.
And a broad coalition of groups threatened to launch an initiative to put the issue to a popular vote, which is possible within Switzerland’s famous direct democratic system.
The head of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Peter Maurer, had also harshly criticised the planned change.
He warned in a radio interview last month that the planned shift had contributed to Switzerland losing “credibility and reliability as a humanitarian actor” on the international stage.
“There is no longer sufficient political support for the reform in the parliamentary security policy committees,” the government acknowledged in Wednesday’s statement.
“Furthermore, to insist on the amendment might be counterproductive with regard to existing authorisation practices in the field of war material exports,” it added.
You may also like
More from Defence Notes
-
![Intelligence innovation: From data overload to decision advantage (Podcast)]()
Intelligence innovation: From data overload to decision advantage (Podcast)
As militaries face an overwhelming flow of data, the challenge is shifting from collection to delivering fast, actionable insights that drive decision-making. Advances in AI and data integration are helping armed forces move beyond siloed systems to generate real-time intelligence across domains and allies.
-
![Teledyne FLIR adds GPS-denied 3D-mapping capabilities to its CBRN uncrewed platforms]()
Teledyne FLIR adds GPS-denied 3D-mapping capabilities to its CBRN uncrewed platforms
In a partnership with Emesent, Teledyne FLIR will equip its autonomous air, ground and detection systems with the Hovermap LiDAR payload in a move that highlights a broader market shift towards modular architectures, shared payloads and interoperability across platforms.
-
![US seeks 32% boost for missile defence budget with $23 billion earmarked for interceptors]()
US seeks 32% boost for missile defence budget with $23 billion earmarked for interceptors
The Pentagon’s proposed budget for the next fiscal year includes an impressive increase in the procurement of interceptors, with the number of the US Army’s PAC-3 MSE rounds expanding by 683%, the US Navy’s Standard Missile by 365% and the MDA’s SM-3 IIA by more than 1,000%.
-
![US Army partners with Global Military Products to surge munitions production]()
US Army partners with Global Military Products to surge munitions production
Global Military Products was selected by the US Army to operate the Quad Cities Cartridge Case Facility and ramp up the production of various calibre shell cases.
