South Sudan looks to foreign powers for peace deal funding
South Sudan has called on the international community to fund efforts to implement a peace deal, which is already four months behind schedule due to lack of money.
In an address to diplomats, deputy foreign minister Deng Dau Deng said the money was needed to move warring forces into cantonment areas, a move seen as vital to addressing security in the country.
"Our specific appeal is for our partners and for the diplomatic community in Juba to give support to plug the gaps... so that we can move," Deng said.
Goc Mokwach, deputy finance minister, told AFP that parliament last year approved estimated spending of $20 million to implement the peace deal, however an overall budget has not been announced.
But Deng said the government only had $1.6 million for peace efforts.
"If you don't have resources, you cannot move," he said. "It is availability of the resources that will actually enhance the process itself."
From the fight for independence until it was achieved in 2011, foreign partners, especially the United States, have poured billions of dollars into the country.
Meanwhile investigations by the Enough Project advocacy group has shown how elites have looted government coffers to enrich themselves and fund the war.
Since the signing of the peace agreement, President Salva Kiir has made a series of foreign visits to South Africa, Egypt, and China, to lobby for resources, Deng said.
The peace agreement signed in September 2018 is the latest effort to end a nearly five year war that began when Kiir accused his former deputy, Riek Machar, of plotting a coup.
During the conflict, nearly 400,000 people died and millions were forced to flee their homes or to the brink of starvation.
But since the agreement was signed, diplomats say there has been a significant reduction in fighting, although pockets of fighting have continued between government forces and rebels who didn't sign the deal, especially in the Equatoria region.
Deng said the national pre-transitional committee, comprising representatives of the different parties to the agreement, have met six times and established five technical committees.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.