South Korea court offers conscientious objectors options
South Korea's Constitutional Court on 28 June upheld the jailing of those who evade the country's military conscription law, but ordered authorities to provide conscientious objectors with an alternative form of national service.
Almost 65 years after the end of the Korean War, nearly every able-bodied South Korean man between the ages of 18 and 35 must still complete around two years of military service.
Anyone refusing the call-up usually ends up in prison for 18 months, and with no alternative community service option some 19,000 conscientious objectors have been jailed since 1950, most of them Jehovah's Witnesses.
In a split decision, the court's nine judges upheld a provision in the current conscription law under which draft dodgers can be punished with up to three years in prison.
The court said in its decision: ‘It is legitimate to enforce military duty through criminal punishment.’
But it ruled that another phrase in the conscription law that does not recognise any alternative to military service is in breach of the constitution.
In a statement, the defence ministry said that it had been considering alternatives to military service, and ‘will decide on a policy at the earliest possible date in line with the Court decision.’
South Korea's armed forces rely heavily on conscription and military service often involves postings to front-line positions on the border with North Korea.
In May 2010, a North Korean submarine torpedoed the South Korean naval vessel Cheonan, killing 46 sailors including 16 who were on military service.
In November 2010, the North shelled a South Korean border island, killing two marines – both of them young conscripts.
But tensions with Pyongyang have drastically eased in 2018, with the North scaling back confrontation over its nuclear arsenal and holding summits with the South and the US, and calls for alternative forms of service have been on the rise.
In several previous cases the country's top courts have backed conscription, but 28 June’s verdict followed appeals from 28 objectors against the law, who cited the freedom of conscience guaranteed in the constitution.
Some 200 objectors are currently serving prison terms and 883 others have cases pending at various levels in the legal system – a number which has grown rapidly in recent months as judges delayed decisions, waiting for the Constitutional Court to rule.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.