Sea Air Space 2011: Service chiefs outline future visions
US Marine Corps (USMC) assistant commandant Gen Joseph Dunford has demanded his service goes on 'weight control' as the force looks to the future.
Speaking to delegates at the Navy League Sea Air Space exposition in Washington DC, Dunford described how current USMC equipment was too heavy. 'Weight will be an independent variable in all the equipment that we purchase in the future, from individual equipment to our vehicles', he announced.
'In order to be expeditionary and capable of getting there and light enough to move, we need help in expeditionary energy. We cannot be the nation's expeditionary force of choice with the kind of footprint that we have right now,' he asserted.
Dunford also described how future procurements would be required to satisfy a hat-trick of requirements, comprising value for money and energy efficiency as well as the aforementioned weight constraints. 'Those three questions are increasingly important to us,' he added.
More specifically, he emphasised how the USMC's replacement of the AAV-7A1 Amphibious Assault Vehicle with the Amphibious Combat Vehicle remained 'our number one ground priority in modernising the ground tactical vehicle portfolio'. Dunford continued to describe how the USMC was committed to replacing the capability lost in the cancelled Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle programme. 'We are optimistic that we are going to get to where we need to be,' he said.
Elsewhere, he described how the USMC was also committed to Lockheed Martin's F-35B Joint Strike Fighter and its STOVL capability, and stated: 'Look at the employment of Harriers over the past 12 months- it's not hard to make a case for why we need 22 “big decks” that are capable of carrying a fifth generation aircraft into the fight. Certainly, we have seen that done to great effect in Afghanistan and in support of special operations forces and most recently in Libya.
'Although [F-35B] been described as being on probation, we are maintaining a presumption of success with the programme,' he urged.
Meanwhile, USN Adm Jonathan Greenert, vice chief of naval operations referred to 'changing and challenging times' and described how the service was 'advancing our capability to meet the most likely threats'.
'The Littoral Combat Ship, P-8 and ballistic missile defence are pretty much on track. We have
accelerated our commitment to the new aircraft, the E2-D, and stabilised Seahawk helicopter and Growler programmes. [Growler] performed in combat in two theatres and did particularly well in libya campaign,' he said.
'Beyond these platforms, we are looking at EW, information dominance, ASW improvements and integrated air missile defence. Our ISR platforms, going beyond FireScout to Fire X to UCAS-D to UCLASS, will move us into the next generation for unmanned surveillance and strike,' he continued while also referring to research and development into the navy's 'new generation jammer'.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.