Russia says West's attitude stoking tensions in Balkans
The West is stoking tensions in the Balkans despite Russia's pacific stance, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was quoted as saying on 19 February ahead of a visit to Serbia.
Lavrov criticised the West for making Balkan states choose ‘either you are with the West or with Russia,’ in an interview with Serbia's Beta news agency.
He said the European Union (EU) tried to get every aspiring member ‘to harmonise its foreign and defence policies’ with that of the bloc, adding that this was ‘increasing tensions in Europe.’
Serbia is seeking EU membership. Moscow supports Belgrade in not recognising the independence of the former Serbian province of Kosovo, proclaimed a decade ago.
Lavrov said: ‘It is senseless to talk now about Kosovo's place in the United Nations.’
He said that Resolution 1244, adopted in 1999 by the UN Security Council to end the conflict between Serbian forces and Kosovo Albanian pro-independence guerillas, ‘remains in place and recognises the autonomous province Kosovo as a part of Serbia.’
The normalisation of ties with Kosovo and harmonisation of its diplomacy with that of the EU are among key criteria Serbia has to meet to join the bloc.
Lavrov said: ‘Throughout the history of the Balkans, Russia has always tried to avoid confrontation and helped the people of this region to defend their interests... and their spiritual, religious and cultural roots.’
Lavrov criticised the ‘politics of encircling Russia with the military infrastructure’ of NATO and said one ‘should not strengthen one's own security at the expense of the security of others.’
Lavrov said: ‘NATO enlargement is a mistake.’
Montenegro joined NATO in 2017, while Macedonia is a candidate.
Lavrov added: ‘No action currently undertaken by NATO increases anyone's security.’
The minister, due to arrive for a two-day visit to Serbia on 21 February, also defended the role played by the pro-Russian media in the Balkans.
Lavrov said: ‘To protect the pluralism of opinion that the West constantly advocates, to have a different point of view can only be beneficial to listeners, viewers and social network users.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.