Mattis in Macedonia to counter 'Russian influence' against name change
US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis arrived in Skopje on 17 September to back a 'yes' vote at this month's referendum on Macedonia's name change and counter what he called ‘Russian influence’ against the move.
On 30 September, Macedonians will vote on whether to change the country's name to the Republic of North Macedonia, which would open the door to NATO and EU membership.
The planned vote follows a landmark deal on the change signed by Athens and Skopje in June in a bid to break a stalemate that has poisoned their relations since 1991 and hobbled Macedonia's integration with the West.
Greece objected to its neighbour being called Macedonia because it has its own province of the same name.
It had accused Skopje of territorial ambitions and blocked the Balkan country from joining NATO or starting EU accession talks.
Mattis said on the plane taking him to Skopje: ‘I think to the people whose lives can be changed by economic opportunities, by security among... 30 democratic nations, I think it's very important that they have those options available.’
But ‘this is a decision for our Macedonian friends. And however they go, you know that we are going to live by it,’ he added.
Mattis is to meet with his Macedonian counterpart Ludmila Sekerinska and with Prime Minister Zoran Zaev, who struck the name-change deal with Greece.
He will also hold talks with President Gjorge Ivanov, close to the rightist nationalists and an opponent of the deal.
Washington accuses Russia, which opposes NATO enlargement in eastern Europe and the Balkans, of leading a disinformation campaign in Macedonia through social media to discourage voters from taking part.
The Pentagon chief slammed what he called ‘Russian influence operations’ in the country of 2.1 million.
He said: ‘We don't want to see Russia doing there what they have tried to do in so many other countries.’
Mattis accused Russia of sending money to influence some political groups.
He said: ‘No doubt that they have transferred money and that they are also conducting a broader influence campaign.’
Montenegro, another tiny Balkan country, joined NATO in 2017, despite the opposition of Moscow and a part of the population.
Laura Cooper, in charge of Russia and central Europe at the Pentagon, accused Moscow of paying voters to boycott the referendum and financially supporting pro-Russian organisations.
Cooper told reporters: ‘They are swooping in now with disinformation and other forms of malign influence to try to change the minds of the Macedonian people. There is this influence campaign to try to buy off people and try to support pro-Russian organisations.’
In an interview with Macedonian news portal Nova Makedonija, Russian ambassador to Skopje Oleg Shcherbak accused the West of putting ‘very strong media and psychological pressure’ on Macedonian voters.
Macedonian media, notably the main TV channels, have led a campaign for a 'yes' vote, which seems the likely outcome.
According to the Macedonian constitution, the referendum will only be ‘consultative’ – meaning that a 'yes' outcome will need to be backed by parliament with a two-thirds majority.
The nationalist opposition VMRO-DPMNE party, which opposes the name change, has decided not to back an ongoing campaign on social media for a boycott of the vote.
Mattis, the first US defence chief to visit Skopje since 2004, said: ‘We'll just look at how they'll shape their own future, not shaped by someone else.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.