Disarmament efforts must include China as well as US and Russia, says Merkel
China must be involved in international disarmament efforts,
German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on 16 February 2019, amid rising concern
about Beijing's missile arsenal and the suspension of a key US-Russia arms treaty.
Fears that the web of agreements limiting the proliferation
of nuclear warheads and other weapons could be in jeopardy have grown since
Washington and Moscow announced their withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range
Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty.
But Merkel's call to launch a fresh push for disarmament and
to include rising military power China met with a brisk rebuff from a top
Beijing official - and was simply ignored by senior US and Russian figures.
‘Disarmament is something that concerns us all and we would
of course be glad if such talks were held not just between the United States,
Europe and Russia but also with China,’ Merkel told the Munich Security
Conference.
Washington began pulling out of the INF treaty this month in
response to Moscow's deployment of a new missile system the US and NATO say
violates the accord, prompting Russia to announce its own withdrawal.
Neither US Vice President Mike Pence nor Russian Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov responded to Merkel's call in their speeches at the
conference.
Unless Washington or Moscow changes course, the INF - which
banned ground-launched missiles with a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometres - will
cease to function in August.
NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg said he had seen no indication Russia might be willing to back down in talks he held with Lavrov on Friday.
The alliance has been urging Russia to save the treaty by
abandoning the controversial 9M279 missile system, which officials say can hit
capital cities throughout Europe as far as London.
No from China
While pointing the finger at each other, both Washington and
Moscow have also voiced concern that the INF does nothing to constrain rapidly
growing military power China.
‘For several years, the Pentagon has been concerned about
the imbalance, according to it, between Chinese and North Korean ballistic and
cruise missiles and American resources in the region,’ France's Foundation for
Strategic Research said in a recent report.
Germany is organising an international conference in Berlin to
start talks about how to create an arms control regime to replace the one
forged in the bipolar Cold War era.
But it will be difficult to persuade China to give up or
restrict what represents an important part of its military capability.
According to a new report by the Institute for Strategic
Studies, up to 95% of China's arsenal of ballistic and cruise missiles
would be in breach of the INF if Beijing were party to it. Given this, ‘it is
difficult to envision a scenario under which China would today enter a regime
such as the INF Treaty,’ the report said.
And Yang Jiechi, a senior Chinese foreign policy official,
unequivocally confirmed Bejing's unwillingness to submit to the INF. ‘China
develops its capabilities strictly according to its defensive needs and doesn't
pose a threat to anybody else,’ Yang told the conference. ‘So we are opposed to
the multilateralisation of INF.’
Some of China's unwillingness stems from the fact the INF
focuses only on ground-launched missiles - covering the bulk of Beijing's
arsenal, said Yao Yunzhu, a retired Chinese general and director emeritus of
the Center on China-American Defense Relations.
‘We don't have the kind of air and sea strike capabilities
like the United States and Russia so there is a big asymmetry here in
capabilities,’ Yao said. ‘So if China is to enter into this kind of
negotiations it will (need) to include not only land-based but also air and sea
based strike missile capabilities... and that will be hugely complicated and
difficult’.
The peril the INF faces has raised concerns about another
major US-Russia arms control treaty, New START, which limits strategic nuclear
weapons and will expire in 2021.
Lavrov recalled that President Vladimir Putin has said
Russia is ‘ready to start negotiations on the extension of this treaty’, but
the minister warned that ‘time flies fast’.
‘So far we were not offered any meaningful consultations,
but we keep trying,’ Lavrov said.