China rejects US accusations it seeks hegemony in Asia
China on 31 May rejected accusations from top US officials that it seeks hegemony in Asia and is pushing militarisation in the South China Sea.
Outgoing US Navy Admiral Harry Harris, set to become Washington's ambassador in South Korea, had said on 30 May that while North Korea posed the most imminent threat to the US, China's ‘dream of hegemony in Asia’ was his country's biggest long-term challenge.
The comments were not surprising, Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a regular press briefing on 31 May, given that ‘those who seek and indulge in hegemony will always think that others are coveting their own hegemony. But no matter how developed China may become, it will never seek hegemony or engage in expansion.’
US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis had vowed on 29 May that the US would keep confronting China over its territorial claims in the South China Sea – where Beijing has established a significant military presence on contested islands.
US diplomats and foreign nations alike were ‘very concerned about this continued militarisation’ in the region, he told reporters.
But Hua termed Mattis' comments ‘rather ridiculous.’
She said: ‘China was not the first country to deploy weapons in the South China Sea, nor is it the country with the most weapons there, and neither is it the country with the most frequent military activities there.
‘As for exactly who is pushing militarisation, everyone can drop the scales from their eyes to see that the answer is self-evident.’
Mattis in February 2018 unveiled the US National Defense Strategy which made clear Washington will focus on Asia in the context of China's growing military might.
Meanwhile, Chinese Ministry of Defence spokesman Ren Guoqiang told a regular press briefing in Beijing on 31 May that the country's sole operational aircraft carrier – the ‘Liaoning’ – has reached initial combat readiness.
The carrier group has conducted multiple exercises which have ‘effectively tested (its) comprehensive attack and defence system’ and prepared it for combat operations on the open seas, he said.
More from Defence Notes
-
Pentagon’s FY26 defence budget proposal is $130 billion more than US Congress plans to provide
The House Committee on Appropriations approved a FY2026 bill reducing investments in main defence programmes.
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.