Planning underway for Trump's military parade
The US military's top officer said on 7 February that planning is underway after US President Donald Trump ordered a military parade, an unconventional demand that has drawn comparisons to sabre rattling more commonly associated with autocrats.
Gen Joe Dunford, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said: ‘I am aware of the President's request and we are in the initial planning stages to meet the President's direction.’
Dunford is the first top US military official to publicly address Trump's longstanding wish for a large-scale military parade, which the White House confirmed on 6 February.
The General did not address a question on whether it would be a good use of military resources.
The US normally reserves its military parades to mark the end of conflicts, such as in 1991 when US President George HW Bush held a National Victory Parade in Washington to celebrate the end of the Gulf War.
Trump's request may well be popular among many Americans but has drawn scorn from critics, who said it would be a waste of money and was akin to events organised by authoritarian regimes.
Dunford's visit to Thailand is part of a week-long tour of the US military's enormous Pacific Command area.
He met his Thai counterpart Tarnchaiyan Srisuwan, as well as Thailand’s defence minister Prawit Wongsuwan and Prayut Chan-O-Cha, the country's Prime Minister.
After a hiatus following the 2014 coup, relations between Washington and Bangkok have resumed and Dunford said he looked forward to a continuing military-to-military relationship.
Dunford said: ‘They (Thailand) have been a good, strong partner for a long time. Our overall strength globally, but in particular in the Pacific, is our network of allies and partners and so Thailand is an important part of that overall network.’
The praise was offered despite the junta's recent postponement of a November 2018 election date which the junta chief announced after a White House visit in October.
The US has consistently urged the generals to follow through on a promised return to democracy.
But they have repeatedly let the poll timeline slip and maintained a tight lid on dissent, with bans on politics and protests of any kind.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.