Pentagon still backs Iran nuclear deal, says official
The Iranian nuclear deal is still in the best interests of the US, a senior Pentagon official said 13 March, going against President Donald Trump's claim that it is a ‘terrible’ agreement.
US Central Command Chief General Joseph Votel told a Senate panel he shared the views of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Joe Dunford, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Votel said: ‘From my perspective, the JCPOA addresses one of the principal threats that we deal with from Iran.
‘So, if the JCPOA goes away, then we will have to have another way to deal with the nuclear weapons programme.’
Trump is threatening to scrap the international agreement unless tough new restrictions were placed on Iran before 12 May.
He cited disagreements on the issue as a reason for his decision to fire on 13 March his Diplomatic Chief Rex Tillerson and replace him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who is considered hawkish.
The president is concerned that parts of the deal start to expire from 2026 and that it fails to address Iran's missile programme, its regional activities or its human rights abuses.
A US exit could kill the nuclear pact, which the Islamic republic has refused to re-negotiate.
Struck in 2015, it was signed by Iran with the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – Britain, China, France, Russia and the US – plus Germany.
Under the agreement, Iran agreed to freeze its nuclear programme in return for the lifting of punishing international sanctions.
While Iran has reaped massive economic benefits from the accord, notably by being able to resume oil exports, it is still constrained by US sanctions in other areas.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.