Pentagon chief Mattis reduced to carrying out orders he dislikes
From housing undocumented migrants to scrapping joint exercises with South Korea or setting up a new Space Force - US Defence Secretary Jim Mattis, one-time favourite of President Donald Trump, now finds himself reduced to carrying out presidential orders despite his disapproval.
US media say that the retired Marine General has been demoted in Washington's power circles by the arrival of former CIA chief Mike Pompeo as Secretary of State, replacing the far-less active Rex Tillerson, and by the appointment of the hawkish John Bolton as National Security Adviser.
Trump has grown distant from Mattis because his defence chief ‘slow-walks his policy directives,’ administration sources told NBC News.
James Clapper, the former US intelligence chief, told CNN that Mattis may quit if the president sidelines him.
Clapper said: ‘I think if it reached the point where he himself felt that he was just ineffective and had no voice, no influence, I don't know how long he would linger.’
Mattis, one of the few voices still considered to be moderate in the Trump cabinet, has faced a growing series of headaches in recent weeks.
Leaving aside Trump's withdrawal from the Iran nuclear accord and the imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminium, both of which Mattis opposed, the former general has been caught off guard several times by snap decisions on subjects where he would normally be consulted.
The Pentagon was taken by surprise when the president announced in early April 2018, on the sidelines of a White House meeting with Baltic leaders, that he was going to deploy the National Guard on the border with Mexico ‘until we can have a wall and proper security.’
On 12 June, Trump announced a halt to joint manoeuvres between US and South Korean forces after a historic meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in Singapore, calling the military exercises with the US ally ‘provocative’ and ‘very expensive.’
It took the Pentagon several hours to confirm the decision, eventually issuing a cautious statement that it ‘welcomes the positive news coming out of the summit and fully supports the ongoing, diplomatically-led efforts with North Korea.’
The manoeuvres were only officially cancelled on 18 June, and two weeks after the summit, the Pentagon has still not made public the cost of the exercises, which might have backed up Trump's comments.
In the week of 18 June, Trump ordered the Pentagon to create a sixth branch of the military, a Space Force that would be independent of the army and air force, something Mattis has publicly opposed on several occasions.
Mattis refrained from any immediate comment on the new force, but his spokesman Dana White noted, without enthusiasm, that the process would take a long time.
White said: ‘Working with Congress, this will be a deliberate process with a great deal of input from multiple stakeholders.’
And in the past week, the Pentagon has been dragged into the quagmire surrounding Trump's illegal immigration policy across the Mexican border, with orders to prepare to house migrant families on military bases, after a backlash against the practice of separating children from their parents.
Mattis, who had carefully avoided taking questions from the press since the start of the policy, had little choice but to comply: 20,000 unaccompanied migrant children will now be housed on military bases, two of which have already been identified in Texas.
Mattis said on 25 June: ‘While I recognise the political aspect of it, for us it is a logistic support effort.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.