NATO chief says spy attack must have 'consequences'
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on 15 March backed a ‘proportionate’ British response to a nerve agent attack on a former Russian spy, saying the incident must have ‘consequences’.
Stoltenberg said the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter, which he called the first offensive use of a nerve agent on the alliance's territory since its foundation, came against the ‘backdrop of a pattern of reckless behaviour’ by Russia.
He said he would hold special talks with British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson in Brussels on 19 March over the attack in the city of Salisbury, but added that Britain had not invoked the alliance's Article 5 mutual defence clause.
British Prime Minister Theresa May ordered the expulsion of 23 Russian diplomats and suspended some high-level contacts with the Kremlin after saying Moscow was ‘culpable’ for the attempted murder of Skripal.
Stoltenberg said: ‘Britain is not alone. I am absolutely certain that the UK will respond and is responding in a proportionate and measured way. But at the same time, I fully support that there is a need for a response, because it has to have consequences when we see actions like we have seen in Salisbury.’
The former Norwegian Premier said NATO itself was not taking any direct steps beyond offering political support, although it would offer ‘practical support’ with the investigation if Britain wanted.
He said NATO was already responding strongly to years of Russian aggression including the annexation of Crimea, the conflict in eastern Ukraine, and meddling in western elections.
Stoltenberg added: ‘The attack in Salisbury has taken place against a backdrop of reckless behaviour by Russia over many years.’
Stoltenberg said Britain had not asked for the triggering of NATO's fundamental collective defence clause – which the US used after the September 11, 2001 attacks.
He said: ‘There has been no request for article 5 and it is for nations to ask for that.’
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.