MDA selects two teams for Next Generation Interceptor development
The Next Generation Interceptor will supersede the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system (pictured) in the US. (Photo: MDA)
Contracts for NGI development, including flight test options for the new long-range missile defence system, will be completed by 2029.
Teams led by Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman each received contracts on 23 March from the US Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to design the Next Generation Interceptor (NGI).
Lockheed Martin is partnered by Aerojet, while Northrop Grumman is teamed with Raytheon.
The contract for both teams, including flight test options for the new long-range missile defence system, will be completed by 2029.
The aim is to protect the US against intercontinental ballistic missile threats in the 2030s.
Neither Northrop Grumman nor Raytheon disclosed the value of their NGI development contract, although the DoD on 23 March announced it is worth $3.93 million. Lockheed Martin disclosed that its deal is valued at $3.7 billion.
In May 2020, the DoD launched a competition for NGI, in search of a new guided missile and warhead as an improvement on the existing Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system in the US.
Incumbent GMD contractor Boeing has not been selected for NGI. Raytheon and Aerojet manufactured the kill vehicle for GMD, while Lockheed Martin stated that it will apply its experience on THAAD and the USN Trident programme to NGI.
This article was amended on 24 March with the contract value for Northrop Grumman.
As part of our promise to deliver comprehensive coverage to our Defence Insight and Premium News subscribers, our curated defence news content provides the latest industry updates, contract awards and programme milestones.
More from Defence Notes
-
![What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow]()
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
![Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme]()
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
![Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans]()
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
![UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions]()
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
![Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details]()
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.
