China nixes US warship port visit, recalls admiral from US
China has pulled the plug on a US warship's scheduled visit to Hong Kong, and scrapped plans for a top admiral to meet with his US counterpart in Washington, officials said on 25 September.
The moves come as trade tensions soar between Beijing and Washington, which in the week of 24 September enacted new tariffs against China covering another $200 billion of its imports.
The USS Wasp, an amphibious assault ship, was due to visit Hong Kong in October 2018. Lieutenant Colonel David Eastburn, a Pentagon spokesman, said the Chinese had scrapped the visit.
Eastburn said: ‘The Chinese government did not approve a request for a US port visit to Hong Kong by the USS Wasp. We have a long track record of successful port visits to Hong Kong, and we expect that will continue.’
China's decision comes after Beijing recalled a top admiral who was visiting the US.
A US defense official told AFP that Vice Admiral Shen Jinlong, who commands the People's Liberation Army Navy, attended a naval symposium in Rhode Island in the week of 17 September.
Following the event, he was planning a visit to Washington that would have included meetings at the Pentagon with his US counterpart, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson.
Eastburn said: ‘We were informed that Vice Admiral Shen Jinlong has been recalled to China and won't conduct a visit with Admiral Richardson.’
In the week of 17 September, Washington placed financial sanctions on the Equipment Development Department of the Chinese Defence Ministry, and its top administrator, for its recent purchase of Russian Sukhoi Su-35 fighter jets and S-400 surface-to-air missile systems.
Beijing responded by summoning the US ambassador to China, Terry Branstad, to lodge an official protest, while the Chinese military expressed ‘strong indignation and resolute opposition’ to the sanctions.
United in their resentment of America's global influence, China and Russia have sought in recent years to tighten up their ties and this month conducted weeklong joint military drills in Moscow's largest ever war games.
Further inflaming tensions, the US State Department said on 24 September that it was set to approve a $330 million sale of military aviation parts to the self-governing island of Taiwan.
Beijing sees Taiwan as part of its territory awaiting unification, and is deeply suspicious of the island's relations with the US.
China expressed ‘strong dissatisfaction’ on 25 September over the planned sale and urged Washington scrap the contract.
Beijing has been incensed by recent warming ties between Washington and Taipei, including the State Department's approval of a preliminary license to sell submarine technology to the island.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.