Axe to fall on US Army programmes
The US Army leadership is deciding which programmes to cut in a bid to ensure funds are available in the coming years to pay for their six modernisation priorities.
Speaking 5 April at The Heritage Foundation — a conservative think thank — US Army Secretary Mark Esper said that the service is looking at its portfolio of 800-plus programmes in order to decide which stay, which will be slowed down and which get the axe.
'We just can't continue to ramble along funding 800 programmes when you have higher priority needs,' Esper told the audience. 'That's spreading the peanut butter…and
Already have an account? Log in
Want to keep reading this article?
More from Defence Notes
-
Palantir and Boeing partner up to bring AI to defence manufacturing
The partnership with the US airframer will see Palantir’s AI software leveraged to help streamline data analytics across Boeing’s 12 factories on defence and classified programmes.
-
DroneShield to double its US footprint to meet growing demand for counter-UxS capabilities
DroneShield disclosed to Shephard its plans to increase its workforce and manufacturing capacities while strengthening partnerships with US suppliers.
-
Singapore’s DSTA seeks wider partnerships to advance robotics and AI capabilities
The technology organisation is expecting a significant rise in the number of staff working across robotics and digital solutions as it becomes more of a focal point.
-
Modular and attritable equipment must be a priority: US military
Senior officers and representatives from the US Army, US Air Force and US Navy emphasised the need to expedite acquisition projects for systems and platforms that are more modular. They also highlighted that the loss of equipment is acceptable.
-
Amazon Project Kuiper offers network-centric approach to sovereignty of space systems (Studio)
Shephard's Alix Valenti interviewed Project Kuiper's Don Brown at DSEI 2025, discussing the company's innovative approach to sovereignty of space communications systems, which focuses on being able to control the network rather than ownership of satellite constellations.