Zimbabwe army vows neutrality in election
Zimbabwe's military vowed on 4 July to stay neutral in upcoming elections, dismissing suggestions it would deploy service personnel to influence national polls scheduled for 30 July.
The military is under close scrutiny following its brief takeover in November 2017 that led to the resignation of former President Robert Mugabe.
Previous elections under Mugabe were marred by violence, intimidation and fraud – often alleged to involve the security forces.
‘The Zimbabwe Defence Forces has no direct role in the upcoming elections,’ said army spokesman Overson Mugwisi at a media conference in Harare ahead of the presidential, parliamentary and local polls later in July 2018.
Mugwisi added: ‘We are disturbed by false reports alleging that the Zimbabwe Defence Forces is going to be used by (the ruling) ZANU-PF to rig the posted vote.’
The army appeared to have staged its media briefing in response to a report in the Standard daily that it had deployed active service personnel to rural areas to campaign for candidates in ZANU-PF primary contests.
The Standard reported that it had received complaints from defeated contenders for the ZANU-PF slate who reported that some winning candidates who were former senior military officers had been ‘roping in the army to win the primary elections.’
Mugwisi said: ‘If some serving members are participating in the ongoing political campaigns, they will be doing so illegally and not as a result of an instruction from their commanders. The conduct of the Zimbabwe Defence forces after elections is going to be guided by the constitution.’
Zimbabwe’s President Emmerson Mnangagwa has pledged to hold free and fair elections as he seeks to mend international relations.
July's polls will be the first ballot box test for Mnangagwa, and the first since Mugabe was forced to resign after 37 years in power.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.