Romania minister under fire over 'ballistic' gaffe
Romania's defence minister on 1 August faced calls to resign after he said the US missile defence system in the south had ballistic missiles, apparently confirming Russian concerns of a security threat near its border.
Romanian Defence Minister Mihai Fifor, during a live interview with a local television station on 31 July, said: ‘How could president (Vladimir) Putin be thrilled that we have the military base at Deveselu with ballistic missiles.’
Fifor later blamed ‘a misunderstanding or an error of communication.’
Fifor told another news channel: ‘No one could ever say that there are ballistic missiles at Deveselu. I said that the base is a defence against ballistic missiles, not that it has any of them.’
Russia sees the missile shield as a security threat on its doorstep, despite the US and NATO insisting it is not aimed at undermining Moscow's defences.
According to NATO, the shield is a purely defensive system equipped with interceptors, which can protect NATO members against short- and medium-range ballistic missiles.
Romania's main opposition parties, the National Liberal Party and the Save Romania Union, have called on Fifor to quit. Former president Traian Basescu of the People's Movement Party also condemned Fifor.
Basescu wrote on Facebook: ‘Mihai Fifor has no place in the government... He confirmed statements made by Putin and other officials who try to undermine the reality, which is that Deveselu is a defensive missile system, not on offensive one.’
Fifor's comments follow two other gaffes.
Romanian Prime Minister Viorica Dancila declared in the week of 23 July that she was ‘happy to be in Pristina’ while visiting Montenegro's capital Podgorica. Pristina is the capital of Kosovo, which Romania does not recognise.
And Romania's agriculture minister apologised in the week of 23 July for having compared the incineration of dead pigs infected with African swine fever to the Auschwitz concentration camp.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.