NATO urges Russia to answer UK spy questions
All 29 NATO countries urged Russia on 14 March to answer Britain's questions over the poisoning of an ex-spy in what they called the first ever offensive use of a nerve agent on the alliance's territory.
The joint statement by the 29 member countries of the US-led alliance said the attack against Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury, southwest England, was a ‘clear breach of international norms and agreements’.
The statement by the North Atlantic Council, which groups NATO allies, said: ‘Allies expressed deep concern at the first offensive use of a nerve agent on Alliance territory since NATO's foundation.
‘Allies expressed solidarity with the UK, offered their support in the conduct of the ongoing investigation, and called on Russia to address the UK's questions, including providing full and complete disclosure of the Novichok programme to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.’
British Prime Minister Theresa May has said a ‘military grade’ nerve agent known as Novichok was used in the 4 March incident.
The statement said: ‘Allies agreed that the attack was a clear breach of international norms and agreements.’
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg added in a tweet: ‘I welcome that the 29 NATO allies have just agreed a statement expressing full solidarity with the UK and offering support after the Salisbury attack.’
The attack has raised speculation that Britain will consider triggering ‘article five’ of NATO membership, a rule that says an attack on one member constitutes an attack on all.
Britain has received broad international support in the wake of the poisoning, which also left a policeman seriously ill.
EU President Donald Tusk said earlier on 14 March that Russia was ‘most likely’ behind the attack and that leaders of the 28 EU states were likely to discuss the issue at a Brussels summit next week.
The UN Security Council is set to hold an emergency meeting on the poisoning later on 14 March at Britain's request.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.