Football offers NATO respite from ugly divisions
Football came to the rescue of tense NATO leaders at a summit on 11 July, providing them with a welcome diversion from the tensions roiling the transatlantic military alliance.
The group is facing one its most difficult meetings in years due to US President Donald Trump's criticism of the organisation and his targeting of German leader Angela Merkel.
But with the World Cup semi-finals in NATO's traditional adversary Russia made up exclusively of members of the western military alliance, the heads of state and government in Brussels were able to turn to football to lighten the atmosphere.
British Prime Minister Theresa May exchanged a team jersey with her Croatian counterpart ahead of the England-Croatia semi-final clash on 11 July night.
Luxembourg Prime Minister Xavier Bettel tweeted a pictured of May smiling with Croatian President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic, saying that everything was ‘still all ok’ between the on-pitch rivals.
The Croatian president also gave May a shirt – and one to Trump with his surname emblazoned on the back, even though the US did not compete in the World Cup finals.
Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel meanwhile teased French President Emmanuel Macron about 10 July’s game between their countries that saw France win 1-0 to book a place in the final on 15 July.
Michel said with a smile: ‘Frankly Emmanuel, yesterday the French team was very lucky.’
But he suggested the sport could provide an example to the military alliance.
Michel said: ‘Like in football, fair-play and team spirit are what we need more than ever.’
NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg declined to say which team he was supporting when asked by reporters.
‘Representing 29 nations I will not pick any specific team I would like to win,’ he said, adding that his own country Norway had not qualified for the finals in Russia.
More from Defence Notes
-
What role could holographic and 3D capabilities play in the warfare of tomorrow
Holographic and 3D technologies have been lauded by some for their ability to provide technical and operational advantages for military training and planning. But is the hype truly justified?
-
Unfolding the Golden Dome for America: Seven things you should know about the programme
Shephard talked to multiple experts about the most pressing concerns and considerations regarding the air defence system advocated by President Trump.
-
Industry welcomes UK Strategic Defence Review, but pressure remains on future defence investment plans
While industry reception to the SDR has been positive, questions still remain from analyst and trade associations about what this could mean for future investment and the future UK Defence Industrial Strategy.
-
UK Strategic Defence Review puts emphasis on autonomy, airpower and munitions
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was launched as one of the first acts of the UK’s new Labour Government in June last year. The review has recommended a major big-picture reform of the country’s forces.
-
Foreshadowing of UK defence review suggests it is light on programme details
The UK’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR) was designed to answer two questions: What is needed to fix UK defence and make it fit for the 2040s, and what do you get for a fixed financial profile? The SDR outlines that work still needs to be done on specifics.